Sacrilege Against the Sacrosanct Sanctum
CAUTION:READ AT YOUR OWN RISK. i am not sure one will come out very out of this article so please understand the caution.
What do u mean by Ramayana, is it Rama who it says to worship, who livd in Ayodhya as a lordship, who helped people and made them cripple who drove fresh nails of obligation into people. A hobglobin who disguised as a messanger of god, and used the weapon of forgiveness to make people trot. His depraved self worked well for his life, untill he was forced to leave his wife, and the ninny Rama did so, face Sita like a hog facing a sow. Vis-a-vis stands Ravana , always picturised as tripe, could have been an oppurtunist by Sita's side. His consequential desire could have been Rama's plight. He really loved Sita but was her eternal fright. Ravana wrong and Rama right? how did anyone happen to cite. Now who loved Sita nothing much to decide. But you won't agree b'cos now its your turn to be the raw material in the industry of the sacrosact sanctum.
What is this mess about Mahabharata. The Kauravas bad and the good were the Pandavas. i heard them say, i was shocked.
if i am not wrong it were the pandavas who begged for kauravas plot. when refused they agreed to a game, Pandavas lost Draupati to add to their shame, they lost their money,they lost their name, Kauravas the mercifull,returned their fame. in turn pandavas declared war , ironically. and above all you worship them , paradoxically. Pandavas were hypocrites to a spectacular degree, and they are still worshipped , such an eerie. If promiscuity today is all about a crimal's fun, then how do you justify, five fornicating one. Anyway the outcome of the war was by what Krishna did, it was nothing but his clever deed. The god of truth was the biggest lier within. His deciphers are like wafers of lie on the wisdom of meringue. they were all who started this profane theism.
Worship nobody, these are just few examples of popular scum, i hereby declare a sacrilege against the sacrosanct sanctum.
What stayed with you?
A line that lingered, a feeling, a disagreement. Great comments are as valuable as the original piece.
Responses17
Thats heresy alright!! Thats certainly meant to offend a lot of people out there!! Keep alive the spirit of rebellion, though!!! [ Reply to this ]
YESSSSS!!!! I'm really looking forward to the comments. The blight, the oversight, the right, the might, the outrage, the rage - will be all very interesting to guage. [ Reply to this ]
I wonder what the motive for writing a piece like this is!!! Is it to generate some controversy and become famous??? 0KB (0 bytes) [ Reply to this ]
hey mr. flower , i was just waiting for a comment like the one gave cos i wanted see how many of u can see things beyond the poem , anyways controversies are generated by writing are do not substantiate what they imply and i dont think that i have written anyting like that. [ Reply to this ] Good Piece! by Gursimran Arora on May 20, 2002 (Monday) Hi Kruttik! Your work is very thought-provoking. However, one lil suggestion - It would've been better as an article. You could've perhaps given it a better look that way. Just a thought! You have a way with words! Keep Writing! [ Reply to this ] Good Piece! by Gursimran Arora on May 20, 2002 (Monday) Hi Kruttik! Your work is very thought-provoking. However, one lil suggestion - It would've been better as an article. You could've perhaps given it a better look that way. Just a thought! You have a way with words! Keep Writing! [ Reply to this ]
hey gursimran thanx for the suggestion but u know the motive of writing articles have evolved in due coarse of time and now the only one purpose is that on tries to use as many attractive words as possible to make it look rhetiroc by actually damaging the essence of the topic chosen. [ Reply to this ] Devil Dog by bullet on May 22, 2002 (Wednesday) Well, the article stinks. You lost me by the fourth line. But thats just me. Seems like ur article is heading for the hall of fame. Too bad they don't go by ratings, but by the number of comments. Too bad the ratings don't go negative. Criticism is overrated... don't mind me. [ Reply to this ]
oh so mr devil dog , do u really think that after writing a sacrilege , i would presume that it will become the hall of fame. sorry for u but u didnt get the crunch out of it , the line where i lost you is the very line where u all have lost urselves(if u understand that ) and i have really procured the motive of writing the poem.I didnt write it to provoke the man in you but the animal with a distorted perception. correct it and let me know eith ur comment. [ Reply to this ] Retribution by bullet on May 23, 2002 (Thursday) Not only did I lose u in the fourth line, I lost all respect for you by the 9th comment! Good going Ms. I-can't-handle-negative-criticism! (P.S.: I would love to read any author's work, but I hate worked up authors) [ Reply to this ]
ur credentials for love and hate goes like this : every of the custumized ,what u call it to be ,authors exist aimlessly, live their lives through weaknesses and die accidently . How much u find urself into it is more important than how much u find the fallen me in my lines.my comments are not to ellicit the fallen me by u but uplift the dying selves of thee. [ Reply to this ]
Let me share this observation with you. I have always found that the degree to which you fight the cause is directly proportional to the uncertainty that nags your subconscious [ Reply to this ]
hey i loved the observation u made and the appreciate the concern u hold for me and my subconscious ,but ,but that is where u lost the essence of subjectivism . i wrote the poem on mythology to give the most clear view of a disease called altruism and fell in the senseless evaluatin of the content of the poem and overlooked the essense of subjectivism , u dissapointed me. [ Reply to this ]
I for one am against altruism all the way through and i could relate to some parts (aspects) of the poem. However, this comment that you made is slightly puzzling.. you say that your comments are meant to uplift the dying selves of thee... arent you indulging in altruism yourself? or did I not understand your article/comment correctly? Do let me know. [ Reply to this ]
hmm nice stuff...i always believe its not the right who wins..but who wins is proclaimed right...u see power is devoid of direction..so its no whats right or wrong at all [ Reply to this ]
hey mr. sauron ,i like ur perception of power and its non directional property . but u mised the point there itself ,for what is right and wrong are just few customized perceptions called reasons and the power is the acceptance of this paralysis by people as imposed on them by the one who desire the power. anyways i believe there is always a choice given to u by the writer to to channelize the latent perceptions of the poem [ Reply to this ]
Sauron never misses a point , u wretched hobbit..i can t hear a word against my master..the darkest of the dark ones..SAURON [ Reply to this ]
hey uruk-hai u amused me yaar , i want to now u better cos u are few those numerous pawns on chess of altruism and u are just going to be wasted ,as any other pawn , to save yet another king or queen whom u have not even met yet . sauron is as i said likewise just another player in the game , maybe gigger than u but just another player waiting to castated on the name of objectivism . so its u to deciede man.bye. [ Reply to this ] sad to read by Muddy on June 09, 2002 (Sunday) hi Kritik After reading the poem and all ur comments defending it. i would like to know only one thing. have u read Ramayan and Mahabharat? [ Reply to this ]
hey muddy , why on earth u like everybody else think that i am defending what i have written . i have written facts that all of us know so i dont thin that there is a debate on that , right . i have then written my perspective on it and perspective are the virtue to reasons nobody can defend it neither u nor me.and i dont think that u read my comments or u didnt understand the way it is written cos then u wouldnt have asked this question. [ Reply to this ]
You still didn't answer his question :o) [ Reply to this ]
i think i answered hs question cos the content of the question is connotational not to the material words in it but to a reason for a sacrilege against the most worshipped relegion . anyways , yes i have studied mahabharata and ramayana enough to support the arguments presented by me in the poem and if u wish i can give u a taste of it . [ Reply to this ] From kruttik agarwal's desk Email kruttik agarwal 1 2 3 4 5 Total 12 ratings. Home | Post Article | General Musings | Slice Of Life | Humor | People | Wanderlust | Sports | Short Stories | Long Stories | Poetry | Book Reviews | eBooks | Devil's Dictionary | Borrowed Best:Articles | Borrowed Best:Stories | Borrowed Best:Poetry | Quick Links | Feedback if ((navigator.appVersion.substring(0,1) '); } All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ©2000 Live2Read var site="sm3l2r" None